Ella Draper and Abraham Christie have recently released a video entitled “Ella & Abraham message of support Thank You Guidance.”
It’s freely available on YouTube but I won’t put it on this site because Abraham names the children.
I suggested in my first article that these allegations were the ramblings of a religious extremist and you can clearly hear in this video the religious references. There is nothing about the children’s well being or any show of concern for them. The last part of the video is clearly a repeat of an earlier part as if they don’t really know what to say. They certainly don’t address any of the evidence that has come from the judges report, like Abraham’s abuse of the children, his violent past and criminal drugs record.
For whatever reason Ella Draper is now completely smitten by Abraham Christie. I can never understand how a mother is able to choose her lover over her children, but this seems to be the case. Listening to the video I can’t help feeling this isn’t going to end well for Ella or Abraham.
The chaos this has caused those poor people in Hampstead where the frustration continues to grow is inexcusable.
Ved Chaudhari can be heard harassing a man of the cloth in this video…
They’re even fighting among themselves!
There was a gentleman named Ray Savage at the demonstration. Ray claims to be an ex Police officer and although I have no reason to doubt his word, I do find what he says very strange indeed.
I wonder if Ray is aware that Ella stated in evidence the injuries the children suffered were caused by their father, Ricky Dearman?
Mr Dearman had not had any recent contact with the children so it was impossible for him to cause the injuries.
Ray also stated that the Police had performed no investigation on this case – yet DI Cannon described in evidence that Barnet Police performed a “wide ranging investigation” in which six officers were deployed and among other activities the Church was searched.
On 12 February, police officers attended at Ms Draper’s address. A gentleman spoke with the police through the letter box and indicated that he was the mother’s lawyer. I believe Ray Savage was also present referred to as “A Friend.” In the video below, you will also hear the many religious references including Abraham reading a psalm right at the beginning .
You can also hear the ridiculous ramblings of the so called “legal representative” who amazingly states he is a qualified lawyer yet constantly refuses to give his name.
Ray, may well be an ex Police officer but it seems for whatever reason he is now involved in all sorts of organisations.
It seems he is linked with the 911 truth movement – this from http://www.killingauntiefilms.co.uk/
Ray attends an anti-fracking rally but seems more interested in radio waves…..
Ray is also involved in an organisation called “The Reset” – which seems to be linked to the “Freeman Movement.”
It strikes me that not only is Ray wrong when he suggested everything Ella had told him was true, or that the Police had not performed an investigation, but it seems he is going the same way as ex Police officer Tony Farrell – who, after a brief encounter with the Hollie Greig case, has now grown a very long beard and professes to be some sort of Messiah!
Christine Ann Sands is another campaigner and the one arguing in the above video. She can be heard shouting the name of her website in many YouTube videos. She’s built a website where she names all the alleged paedophiles in this case – which includes their telephone numbers, as well as home and email addresses.
In my opinion it’s complete slander and libel of innocent people and Christine deserves to feel the full force of the law.
The resemblance to the Hollie Greig case is amazing! The claims made against the father, the children’s former teachers, professionals and large numbers of others means many of those individuals are now living in fear as they have been identified all over the internet.
I have broken down the Judges report yet again which the campaigners may wish to read and answer the many questions it brings.
- In May 2014, the children’s father, Ricky Dearman, had contact with the children for the first time since October 2013. In that same month, Ella met Abraham Christie.
- On 4 June 2014, there was a scene in the playground at Christchurch School when Mr Christie was collecting P and Q at the end of the school day. He was loud and aggressive, accusing the teachers of poisoning the children by giving them the food supplied at the school.
Is it a co-incidence the claims begin the same month Ella met Abraham? And the same month the children’s father finally gets to see his children which we know Ella didn’t want to happen! Is it rational to suggest a school, where many other children attend should “poison” the children? Especially when there have been no reports of food poisoning?
- In August 2014, Jean-Clement Yaohirou received ‘phone calls and messages from Mr Christie in which he said he had information regarding the abuse of children. In the same month the mother, Mr Christie and the children went abroad. They travelled to Gibraltar and then Morocco. They returned to the UK on 4 September.
Is it reasonable to take children on holiday after learning about their horrific abuse? Would a rational parent do such a thing? Or would they inform the police? Anne Greig also dismissed Hollies’ alleged claims and told her to report them to her social worker – although Robert Green stated Anne “immediately reported them to the Police.”
- On 4 September 2014 Mr Yaohirou met with Mr Christie,Ms Draper and the children. With great presence of mind, Mr Yaohirou recorded the conversations on his mobile phone and contacted the Scotland Yard as he feared for the children’s safety.
- On 5 September Barnet Police began what DI Cannon described in evidence as a “wide ranging investigation” involving as it seemed “threats to life.” In all, six officers were deployed. That evening, DC Martin conducted ABE interviews with P and Q.
- On 10 September, DS Fernandez and DC Martin arrived unannounced at the church and searched it. They found nothing of interest to the inquiry.
No evidence found of this huge satanic paedophile group??
- That same day, P and Q underwent further ABE interviews, led by DC Martin. DS Fernandez interviewed the mother. He described in evidence how Ms Draper had told him in great detail about abuse but there had been “no tears at all.” There was, he said, “a distinct lack of emotion.” It was “just like she had learned this – it was quite strange.”
Is it reasonable to believe that a loving mother would able to recount such horrific atrocities of abuse done to her children without one ounce of emotion?
- On 11 September, P and Q were made the subjects of a Police Protection Order.
- On 12 September, both children were examined by Dr Hodes.
- On 16 September, Dr Hodes performed a second examination of both children.
- On 17 September, there were further ABE interviews.
Ella and Abraham’s part.
- In the initial stages of the proceedings, Ms Draper had representation by experienced Solicitors and Counsel. On 10 December 2014, at court, she dispensed with her legal team. Dates were secured for this hearing as follows: 17 – 20 February, 3 – 6 and 10 – 12 March. On 13 January, the indications from Ms Draper were that once again she would avail herself of legal representation.
Just like Robert Green, he too started out with legal representation but soon after sacked them when he didn’t like what he was told.
- Until 26 January 2015, Ella appeared as a litigant in person assisted by McKenzie friends Belinda Mckenzie and Sabine McNeil. On 9 February she was notified by email, that there would be a hearing the following day. Ella failed to attend court on 10 February when mandatory and prohibitory injunctions were made against her.
Ella has had every chance to fight this aided by her McKenzie friends – she chose not to.
- Ella’s personal statement for 26 January hearing, written for her by Ms Sabine McNeill, she made a thinly veiled threat as to what would happen if the children “were not returned to their mother and grandparents with immediate effect.” Ella stated that the consequence would be “high level embarrassment.” An open letter to Theresa May, the Home Secretary, posted on the internet, explicitly states that the Position Statement was “our offer NOT to expose this scandal in exchange for returning the children.”
Does this mean if the allegation were true, Ella would be happy to hide the truth and let hundreds of other children suffer in exchange for the safe return of her children?
- DS Paul Speer from Colindale police station described in evidence what happened firstly on the morning of 10 February when he spoke with Ms Draper over the telephone to discuss the material on the internet. Ms Draper told DS Speer that “it was nothing to do with (her).” She did not wish to speak to him and did not trust the police.
So instead of reporting these horrific crimes to the Police, which remember included the abuse of other children, Ella and Abraham decided to post the videos of the children on the internet. Then when the police become involved Ella state’s it was nothing to do with her?? Perhaps at that stage…..it wasn’t!
- On 12 February, police officers attended at Ms Draper’s address. Her car was on the driveway. A gentleman spoke with the police through the letter box and indicated that he was the mother’s lawyer. The police explained they were there to discuss possible offences committed under s.4 of the Harassment Act 1997. They were denied entry to the property. Ella Draper and Abraham Christie left the property through a window, and were seen on the escaping along the roof line. They have not been seen by anyone in authority since.
Was Ray Savage present?
- The oral evidence began on 17 February. Ella sent an email that morning asking permission for her McKenzie friend, Belinda McKenzie to represent her and her parents’ interests in court. It was explained to Ms McKenzie, in circumstances where the mother herself was absent, the Practice Guidance relating to McKenzie Friends expressly prohibits such an individual from acting as the litigant’s agent or from conducting the litigation on her behalf.
- Belinda McKenzie remained in contact with Ms Draper and she assured the judge she would pass on a message urging the mother to participate by coming to court and informing her that the hearing would continue in her absence. Outside court on 17 February, Belinda indicated to the local authority’s legal team that Ms Draper was in the process of instructing a lawyer. However, at no stage, has there been any contact with anyone purporting to act on behalf of Ms Draper.
- Ella remained absent from the court. Attempts at securing Mr Christie’s participation in the proceedings were unsuccessful as a series of communications from the local authority’s Solicitor went unanswered.
- As it is, Ella nor Abraham has not communicated either with the local authority or with the court any time since 17 February. Nor have they had contact with or made any inquiry about the children.
Both absconded to evade the authorities. Surely caring parents wouldn’t abandon their children.
- Ella stated in documents filed by her entitled, “Summaries in support of the accusations made by my children, “The statements made …are not only exceptionally serious, but also so outrageous that they are effectively unbelievable. Hence my then partner Abraham Christie and I talked to them separately on holidays to ensure that their allegations were the truth.
Yet according to Abraham the allegations came out before they went on holiday, but they still took the children on two holidays lasting 4 weeks before releasing the information on the internet rather than reporting to matter to the police.
- In relation to the children’s “supposed retractions,” Ella suggested they are inconsistent with their previous accounts over many weeks to different people. Neither their stories nor their body language on the police video of 17.09.14 are, she says, convincing.
In all the children’s videos, anyone can see they are recounting a story. Just like their mother. No one would be able to recount such horrific events with such little emotion.
- Ella’s claims the sexual abuse extend back to the time when P and Q were babies and she also claims that Mr Dearman rather than Mr Christie was responsible for the assaults which led to physical signs of injury as found by Dr Hodes last September.
Possibly the most important piece of evidence and similar to the claims of Anne Greig. She too claimed the abuse of Hollie started when Hollie was aged 6. But if true, this would only add weight to the medical evidence. A child abused from such a young age would show clear signs of that abuse. If a huge cult had been abusing these children every week for such a long time the physical signs would be absolutely overwhelming. The medical evidence was difficult enough for Dr Hodges, so much so she had it peer reviewed which showed nothing with one child and only a moderate suggestion of possible abuse with the other – which could also be seen in none abused children. Consider this, with fact the children were given enemas there is no hard medical evidence the children were sexually abused. Dr. Hodes’ final conclusion was “possible normal variant.”
- There is medical evidence of injuries the children had suffered. At first, Ella maintained they were caused by their father, Ricky Dearman – she gives this information in evidence. However later Abraham admits he had hit the children with a spoon and caused the injuries. As Ricky Dearman has not had contact with the children since May, there is no way he could have caused these injuries.
So, Ella lied about the injuries to the children which included water torture. We have already seen in other cases where mothers allow their partners to abuse and injury their children. The children stated in evidence their mother thought it ok for Abraham to hit the children. It’s no wonder then the children have been taken into care.
- Ricky Dearman gave evidence and denied there was truth in anything suggested. He described Ella as: “When Ella is not doing crazy stuff she is a really beautiful person.”
- P said that she and Q would call Mr Christie “Papa Hemp”
The only way the children could have cannabinoids in their bodies is by either smoking or ingestion of cannabis. Given the only contact they have had is with their mother and Abraham, who they call Papa Hemp, there is little doubt the children have been fed cannabis – especially as they admitted such in their own evidence.
- Both P and Q withdraw all their claims P said that Abraham had told them what to say. She had told him that one of her female friends, had touched her – Abraham had said, “No, it’s your Dad.” P said that “it was all made up,” everything about the school, the church, the swimming pool; none of it was true. Abraham, she said, “had hurt (her) and used bad words “a stupid little cunt”. She was scared and worried. Her mother had not stopped Abraham “because she loves him so much.” P described him as “an idiot.” As for her father, P said he is “fine and good.”
- Q said, “None of it was real…. The plastic willies were not true.” Abraham had “slapped his ear as hard as he could.” Q said, “I hate Abraham” and he did not want to see him again. He described how his mother “would be really angry with (him).”
The evidence by both children clearly showed they were assaulted by Mr Christie by being hit with a metal spoon on multiple occasions over their head and legs, by being pushed into walls, punched, pinched and kicked. Water was also poured over them as they knelt semi-clothed.
I believe Ella Draper and Abraham Christie are dangerously delusional, religious extremists.
The only thing missing now is a donate button…..
Have a pleasant evening.